Mr. Lee,

This page was built for Clark Atlanta. It is a short, candid outside read on the University’s operating environment, prepared by CampusWorks + Dynamic Campus using publicly available information.

Clark Atlanta’s Destination 2028 calls for IT governance that improves planning efficiency and reduces costs. Those priorities provide a clear basis for evaluating technology value across the organization and the operating decisions that support student success.

Three things caught our attention.

1.  Strategic priorities provide a basis for operating choices. Technology spending can be evaluated against the University’s planning, cost, and student success goals.
2. Destination 2028 calls for planning efficiency and lower costs. IT governance provides a useful point of connection between those goals.
3. Financial visibility depends on processes as well as tools. Reviewing internal capabilities, external support, and manual work can make recurring commitments easier to evaluate.

Why Clark Atlanta? Why now?

1. Destination 2028 establishes measurable student priorities. Technology delivery can be examined against them.
2. The University is advancing its systems agenda. Governance and support can be considered alongside that work.
3. Planning efficiency is an explicit goal. A documented baseline can help connect future spending to operational needs.

This is a useful moment to step back because the evaluation is most valuable while important choices are still open — before the next operating model becomes the default.

What you can expect from a Different Perspective evaluation

CampusWorks + Dynamic Campus will provide a complimentary Different Perspective evaluation that will result in a concise, executive-level assessment designed to help you better understand the current IT environment, identify opportunities for improvement, and determine if your current IT operating model is built for where your institution is headed.

Deliverables include:

• Key observations, findings, and recommendations emerging from the assessment.
• SWOT analysis identifying strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and risks within the current IT environment.
• Quick wins and areas for growth highlighting opportunities for near-term improvement as well as areas requiring longer-term attention.
• High-level strategies and forward-looking options, including a 12–18-month recommendation roadmap to help guide sequencing and next steps.
• Core systems analysis covering the institution’s ERP, SIS, CRM, and related platforms.
• Initial maturity assessment of operational practices, governance, AI maturity, and cybersecurity posture.
• Prioritized themes for improvement or change identifying the areas that warrant the greatest attention, investment, or further exploration.

Before you carry today’s model forward, get a different perspective.

No proposal. No obligation. No requirement to change providers. No commitment of any kind.

Just an independent perspective on what the current model delivers, what the institution needs next, and whether those two things are still aligned.

Why CampusWorks + Dynamic Campus?

Because managed services should evolve with the institution. CampusWorks + Dynamic Campus bring together deep IT and functional expertise to deliver one of higher education’s most comprehensive managed services models. Our integrated approach is designed for today’s financial, operational, workforce, and technology realities — helping institutions extend capacity, reduce risk, strengthen resilience, and improve the way work gets done across the enterprise.

More importantly, we help institutions look beyond the status quo. With expertise that extends well beyond technology alone, we provide the perspective, flexibility, and support needed to choose an operating model aligned with where the institution is headed next.