Dr. Bellanca,
This page was built for Washtenaw. It is a short, candid outside read on the College’s operating environment, prepared by CampusWorks + Dynamic Campus from the public record before any conversation with your office.
Washtenaw’s recognized completion performance and new semiconductor learning opportunities reflect a College continuing to expand what it offers students. Maintaining in-district tuition at $99 per credit makes the capacity behind those opportunities especially important.

Three things caught our attention.
- Student success and new programs set the agenda. Recognized completion performance and new semiconductor opportunities give technology delivery a clear purpose.
- Affordability places a premium on useful capacity. Maintaining in-district tuition at $99 per credit makes effective use of systems and support especially relevant.
- Our earlier work provides a starting relationship. CampusWorks would welcome a fresh look at today’s environment in light of Washtenaw’s current priorities.

Why Washtenaw. Why now.
- New learning opportunities are expanding. The College can examine the capabilities needed to support them.
- Affordability remains central. Technology value can be considered alongside tuition and budget priorities.
- The institution’s needs continue to evolve. A fresh assessment can focus on today’s environment and future plans.
This is a useful moment to step back because the evaluation is most valuable while important choices are still open — before the next operating model becomes the default.

What you can expect from a Different Perspective evaluation
CampusWorks + Dynamic Campus will provide a complimentary Different Perspective evaluation that will result in a concise, executive-level assessment designed to help you better understand the current IT environment, identify opportunities for improvement, and determine if your current IT managed services model is built for where your institution is headed.
Deliverables include:
- Key observations, findings, and recommendations emerging from the assessment.
- SWOT analysis identifying strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and risks within the current IT environment.
- Quick wins and areas for growth highlighting opportunities for near-term improvement as well as areas requiring longer-term attention.
- High-level strategies and forward-looking options, including a 12–18-month recommendation roadmap to help guide sequencing and next steps.
- Core systems analysis covering the institution’s ERP, SIS, CRM, and related platforms.
- Initial maturity assessment of operational practices, governance, AI maturity, and cybersecurity posture.
- Prioritized themes for improvement or change identifying the areas that warrant the greatest attention, investment, or further exploration.

Before you carry today’s model forward, get a different perspective.
No proposal. No obligation. No requirement to change providers. No commitment of any kind.
Just an independent perspective on what the current model delivers, what the institution needs next, and whether those two things are still aligned.
Why CampusWorks + Dynamic Campus?
Because managed services should evolve with the institution. CampusWorks + Dynamic Campus bring together deep IT and functional expertise to deliver one of higher education’s most comprehensive managed services models. Our integrated approach is designed for today’s financial, operational, workforce, and technology realities — helping institutions extend capacity, reduce risk, strengthen resilience, and improve the way work gets done across the enterprise.
More importantly, we help institutions look beyond the status quo. With expertise that extends well beyond technology alone, we provide the perspective, flexibility, and support needed to choose an operating model aligned with where the institution is headed next.
Request Washtenaw’s evaluation
No proposal. No obligation. A $25,000 evaluation, complimentary.
Request Washtenaw’s evaluation
No proposal. No obligation. A $25,000 evaluation, complimentary.
Request Your Different Perspective Evaluation